Why Pitney Bowes Stock Rocketed 36% Higher on Aug. 3

Why Pitney Bowes Stock Rocketed 36% Higher on Aug. 3

Investors have taken a real shine to the stock just a couple of days after the company reported earnings, thanks to one broker’s change of opinion. Elie Honig writes that anyway you cut it, the Manhattan District Attorney’s subpeona into Trump’s financial firm is bad news for the President, which explains why Trump’s lawyers are trying so hard to quash the subpeona in court now. Aug 03, 2020 (CDN Newswire via Comtex) —
Global Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil Market Growth 2020-2025 fetches a scheduled analysis of the market covering… FINALLY, THE ROCK HAS COME BACK TO … PRO FOOTBALL!?

Shares of e-commerce, shipping, and postage company Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) jumped an incredible 36% in early trading on Aug. 3. The stock was still holding on to those gains at roughly noon EDT. The stock is now up more than 50% over the past five trading days … and the only material news out of the company today was a $5 million contract.

Pitney Bowes reported second-quarter results on July 30, with adjusted earnings of $0.04 per share. That was down materially from the $0.19 per share earned in the same period of 2019 — but above the analyst consensus estimate of a $0.01 loss. So Pitney Bowes didn’t do well, but it didn’t exactly do badly, either, during what has so far been the worst of the COVID-19-related global economic shutdowns.  

A woman smiles at her desk in an office.

Image source: Getty Images.

This morning, meanwhile, the company announced that it had inked a $5 million shipping and mailing contract with the U.S. government. That’s a pretty small deal for Pitney Bowes, considering that its second-quarter revenues alone totaled more than $500 million. But it shows that there are positive things going on at the company as it continues to transition toward a digital future from its very analog past (historically, the company’s big products, such as postal scales, centered around sending physical mail). That contract isn’t really enough to lead to a 28% share price gain, however — unless the increasingly positive backstory here also leads to an analyst upgrade, like the one that happened today at National Securities taking Pitney Bowes from neutral to buy. And that’s exactly what investors are doing today, in very dramatic fashion.  

Pitney Bowes is celebrating its 100-year anniversary in 2020. That’s an impressive amount of time for a company to stick around, but it comes as management is trying to reorient the business in a more digital direction. There are some signs of success in what has been a very long and at times difficult process. However, after the huge stock price jump in recent days, Wall Street appears to be pricing in a lot of good news here. Long-term investors should probably tread with caution.

Source: www.fool.com

Author: Reuben Gregg Brewer

Opinion: The news Trump really didn't want to hear

Opinion: The news Trump really didn’t want to hear

Elie Honig is a CNN legal analyst and former federal and state prosecutor. The views expressed in this commentary are his own. View more opinion on CNN. Watch Honig answer readers’ questions on “CNN Newsroom with Ana Cabrera” on weekends.

(CNN)Any way you cut it, the Manhattan district attorney’s subpoena to President Donald Trump’s financial firm Mazars USA is bad news for Trump. And that’s why Trump’s lawyers are trying so desperately to get the subpoena thrown out.

Elie Honig

New revelations about the subpoena show that prosecutors are focused on alleged crimes that go beyond hush money payments made by the Trump Organization to two women who alleged that they had affairs with Trump (Trump denies the affairs). Prosecutors are also focused on a series of financial transactions that could relate to potential tax fraud, insurance fraud and bank fraud.

    Here’s why this should concern Trump and his team. Criminal charges relating to hush money payments are notoriously difficult to prove because they rely on proof of intent: Were the payments made to influence an election or for some other reason (including bad but non-criminal reasons, such as preventing personal embarrassment)?

    Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York investigated the payments for years, but only brought charges against one person — the President’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty — before reportedly closing out the investigation. (Though the SDNY noted in a court filing that Cohen had acted “in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1” — plainly, Trump — and long-standing Justice Department policy counsels against indicting a sitting president).

    But New York prosecutors now seem focused on more easily provable, document-based frauds. New York prosecutors noted that their investigation is based, at least in part, on public reporting. Indeed, prosecutors reportedly are investigating potential tax fraud based on intentional misstatements of the value of Trump Organization assets, as reported last year by Pro Publica.

    And Cohen testified in Congress in February 2019 that he believed Trump inflated the value of his assets to secure bank loans and insurance policies. (Trump’s lawyers have denied any wrongdoing.) If the black-and-white financial documents support any of these allegations — if they show, for example, that Trump or anyone else intentionally inflated or deflated the value of Trump Organization assets — then a garden-variety fraud charge could be in order. As a prosecutor, I learned that the simplest charges are usually the most powerful and most difficult for defendants to overcome.

    This case is the continuation of a battle that already has gone poorly for Trump. He initially fought the subpoena by claiming that, as a sitting president, he held “absolute immunity” from criminal investigation. The Supreme Court firmly rejected that argument by a 7-2 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Trump-appointed Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joining the four traditionally liberal justices in a cross-ideological majority.

    The court sent the case back to the lower court to enable Trump to raise the objections that any non-presidential subpoena recipient can raise in the lower courts. But those objections rarely succeed. In my 14 years as a prosecutor, I never had a subpoena recipient succeed in quashing (essentially, defeating) a criminal subpoena.

    New York prosecutors clearly still have work to do. They need to prevail in the pending subpoena dispute, which seems likely, and then put together all the pieces to determine whether state-level criminal charges are just and warranted against Trump or anyone else in the Trump Organization.

    But the statements prosecutors made in court on Monday indicate they are determined to move quickly, and that they are focused on the most readily provable potential charges.

    Now, your questions

    Nicolaus (Illinois): When asked if the President could postpone the election, Attorney General William Barr said he did not know. Is there a clear answer under our legal system?

    There is a clear answer: No, the President cannot unilaterally postpone the general election. It was curious that the attorney general did not know this; hopefully he has since been brought up to speed.

    The Constitution specifically empowers Congress to set the date for the presidential election, and requires that the date be uniform throughout the country. Exercising that constitutional authority, Congress long ago passed a federal law setting the date for the general election as the Tuesday after the first Monday in November — which, in 2020, falls on November 3. Congress could pass a new law setting a different national election date, but that would require majority votes in the Democratic-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate, plus the President’s signature.

    Even in the exceedingly unlikely event that Congress passes and the President signs legislation postponing the 2020 general election, the date can only be pushed back so far. The 20th Amendment to the Constitution requires that the terms of the president and vice president end at noon on January 20. The Constitution can, of course, be amended, but that requires votes of two-thirds of both the House and the Senate, plus ratification from three-fourths of all state legislatures. That simply is not going to happen, either as a political or practical matter, before January 2021.

    Charles (Georgia): As chief justice of the US Supreme Court, what power does John Roberts have over federal judges in the lower courts?

    Not much. As chief justice, Roberts holds several important powers relating to the Supreme Court itself, including presiding over oral argument sessions and internal conferences, assigning decisions to be written by other justices (when he is in the majority) and managing the court’s building and operations.

    But when it comes to the lower federal courts, the chief justice has very little power. He serves as chair of the Judicial Conference of the United States and other committees. He can appoint certain judges to various policy commissions and rule-making bodies, and he reports to Congress on changes made to the federal rules of procedure.

    But the chief justice has no ability to nominate, appoint, remove or discipline federal judges. He has no say over their caseloads or decision-making. So, the chief justice has limited, almost entirely ministerial, oversight of the lower federal courts.

    Janice (Indiana): Does the President have the authority to send federal forces to a state or city without a request from a local government?

    Yes, but it’s important to keep two things separate: the military versus federal law enforcement. First, as to the military, under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has authority to deploy federal troops in certain circumstances: (1) where requested by a state governor, (2) where necessary to “suppress” unlawful “obstruction” or “rebellion,” or (3) where required to prevent interference with enforcement of federal or state laws. While a request from a governor is necessary under the first of those provisions, it is not necessary under the second and third.

    Separately, the president has virtually unlimited control over where and when to deploy federal law enforcement agents (from the FBI or DEA, for example). There is no law requiring the federal government to receive an invitation from state or local authorities, although in my experience, law enforcement is safer and more effective when federal and state and local agencies communicate and coordinate with one another.

    There are real questions about whether federal law enforcement agents have been deployed wisely in Portland and elsewhere, and over the tactics utilized by those agents — including reported use of excessive force and arrests without probable cause. But there is no law requiring agreement or consent from state or local authorities before the federal government can deploy law enforcement agents.

    Three questions to watch

    1) Will Trump continue to suggest that there should be potential delays to Election Day?

      2) Will we see resolution in the legal battle between the Georgia governor and Atlanta mayor over face mask mandates?

      3) Now that the Court of Appeals has decided to rehear the Michael Flynn case “en banc” — by a panel of all 10 eligible (non-recused) Court of Appeals judges — will Flynn’s conviction remain intact?

      Source: www.cnn.com

      Author: Opinion by Elie Honig

      Global Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil Market 2020 Industry Research, Business Growth, Future Investment and Emerging Trend to 2025

      Global Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil Market 2020 Industry Research, Business Growth, Future Investment and Emerging Trend to 2025

      The report throws light on the competitive environment of the global Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil market based on company profiles, product value, and production. Leading players are also studied based on market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, and price. The study also describes market sale terms, period, past and present sale percent, product cost or purchase cost of products or service, and market economic conditions. Deals, income, and value examination of the industry are examined.

      NOTE: Our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe explains that the market will generate remunerative prospects for producers post COVID-19 crisis. The report aims to provide an additional illustration of the latest scenario, economic slowdown, and COVID-19 impact on the overall industry.

      DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT:https://www.marketandresearch.biz/sample-request/139815

      Core Segmentations:

      The global Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil market can be segmented on the basis of the types, their applications, and geography. The report investigates the principals, players in the market, geological regions, product type, and market end-client applications. The report also shows a comparison of regions and courtiers, comparison of types, and a comparison of applications.

      Leading manufacturers/companies operating at both regional and global levels: Botanic Innovations, A&A Fratelli Parodi, Natuva, Green Source Organics, OQEMA, Esperis, Northstar Lipids, Shenyang Phytocare Ingredients, Gustav Heess, New Directions Aromatics, Caribbean Natural, Nikkol, Jeen International, Green Angel, Earthoil, All Organic Treasures, BioOrganic Concepts, Custom Ingredients, Henry Lamotte Oils, Paradigm Science, Provital, Vantage Specialty Ingredients, Robina Biotechnology Development Company, Croda, OLVEA Vegetable Oils, Bionest, R.I.T.A,

      Market segment by product type, split into Mechanical Pressing, Solvent Extraction, Carbon Dioxide Supercritical Extraction, along with their consumption (sales), market share and growth rate

      Market segment by application, split into Cosmetics Industry, Food Industry, Health Products, Other along with their consumption (sales), market share and growth rate

      Regional Insights:

      The research covers the current market size of the global Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil market and its growth rates based on historical data. The report provides information on trends and developments and focuses on markets and materials, capacities, technologies, and the changing structure of the global market. Country-level analysis of the market is given for segment by application, product type, and sub-segments. The report covers various types of segmentation such as by geography: Americas (United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil), APAC (China, Japan, Korea, Southeast Asia, India, Australia), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia), Middle East & Africa (Egypt, South Africa, Israel, Turkey, GCC Countries)

      ACCESS FULL REPORT:https://www.marketandresearch.biz/report/139815/global-vitis-vinifera-seed-oil-market-growth-2020-2025

      This Research/analysis Report Contains Answers to Your Following Questions:

      Customization of the Report:
      This report can be customized to meet the client’s requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@marketandresearch.biz), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

      About Us

      Marketandresearch.biz is a leading global Market Research agency providing expert research solutions, trusted by the best. We understand the importance of knowing what global consumers watch and buy, further using the same to document our distinguished research reports. Marketandresearch.biz has worldwide presence to facilitate real market intelligence using latest methodology, best-in-class research techniques and cost-effective measures for world’s leading research professionals and agencies. We study consumers in more than 100 countries to give you the most complete view of trends and habits worldwide. Marketsandresearch.biz is a leading provider of Full-Service Research, Global Project Management, Market Research Operations and Online Panel Services.

      Contact Us
      Mark Stone
      Head of Business Development
      Phone: +1-201-465-4211

      This content has been distributed via CDN Newswire press release distribution service. For press release enquires please mail us at contact@cdnnewswire.com.


      Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

      Source: www.marketwatch.com

      The Rock Buys XFL In $15 Million Deal, 'Creating Something Special'

      The Rock Buys XFL In $15 Million Deal, ‘Creating Something Special’

      Breaking News


      The WWE legend just teamed up with an investment group to snatch up Vince McMahon’s XFL league for $15 million, the league confirms in a statement.

      The league had filed for bankruptcy after being resurrected for the 2020 season — and was supposed to be auctioned off to highest bidder on Monday.

      But, Dwayne Johnson and his partners — Dany Garcia (Rock’s business partner and ex-wife) and partners at RedBird Capital (led by Gerry Cardinale) — swooped in and bought it up this weekend before it hit the auction block.

      The deal must now be approved in bankruptcy court on Friday — and if everything goes smoothly, it could close by August 21.

      The Rock (along with Dany) and RedBird are reportedly 50/50 partners in the deal.

      Remember, the XFL got off to a pretty decent start in 2020 — but COVID essentially served as a death sentence to the league, forcing it to shut down in March.

      The league filed for chapter 11 in April — listing $10 to $50 million in debts.

      As for The Rock, he famously played college football at the University of Miami back in the day before becoming a global pro wrestling superstar with Vince McMahon’s WWE.

      He’s gone on to become one of the biggest stars in Hollywood — and a storyline on his show “Ballers” had his character pursuing the purchase of an NFL franchise.

      Source: www.tmz.com

      Why Pitney Bowes Stock Rocketed 36% Higher on Aug. 3

      Leave a Comment