VIEW: Decoding the Supreme Court’s cryptocurrency judgement

VIEW: Decoding the Supreme Court's cryptocurrency judgement

The use of cryptocurrency has always been a point of contention with its legality being a mystery to the public. Bitcoins are a form of digital currency and are not considered to be legal tender. However, these are capable of functioning as a medium of exchange akin to money. The lack of a traditional government or bank-backed system to regulate its use makes cryptocurrencies the target of several concerns such as it being a conduit for black money or anonymously funding terrorism. Despite the odds, cryptocurrencies have gained popularity worldwide and the cryptocurrency market in India has also been slowly gathering momentum.

Since 2013, various warnings were issued by the RBI through its press releases regarding the potential risks of the use of cryptocurrencies to the financial system of the country. The Inter-ministerial Committee on February 28, 2019, had also released a report recommending certain measures in relation to cryptocurrencies, which included a complete ban on private cryptocurrencies. This committee had also prepared a draft bill known as Crypto Token and Crypto Asset (Banning, Control and Regulation) Bill, 2018 (the fate of which is currently unknown). However, the use of cryptocurrency per se was never banned.

In April 2018, the RBI issued a circular banning regulated financial institutions from providing services to businesses dealing in exchange/trading of cryptocurrencies, which put the entire Indian cryptocurrency trading industry in turmoil. The validity of the circular was challenged before the Supreme Court in various writ petitions lead by crypto-trading entities. In its decision in the Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India, the Supreme Court deliberated on cryptocurrency and struck down the circular.

The Supreme Court analyzed the role of RBI in the economy as a central bank to manage currency, money supply and interest rates and recognized that the maintenance of price stability as an objective of RBI. The Supreme Court noted that cryptocurrency is capable of being accepted as valid payment for the purchase of goods and services, and payment systems can be regulated by the RBI.

The Supreme Court held that the RBI was within its rights to issue the circular in fulfillment of its objective under law to safeguard the “public interest, interests of depositors and interests of the banking policy”. The Supreme Court stated that “Therefore, anything that may pose a threat to or have an impact on the financial system of the country, can be regulated or prohibited by RBI, despite the said activity not forming part of the credit system or payment system.” As the circular was found to be issued in the interest of banking policy, the depositors and of the public at large, the Supreme Court rejected the contention that there had been excessive use of power by RBI.

The circular was also challenged on the grounds that denial of access to those who trade in cryptocurrency would tantamount to a denial of their constitutional right to carry on any trade or profession and thus would be violative of Article 19(1)(g). The Supreme Court upheld this contention by stating that “There can also be no quarrel with the proposition that banking channels provide the lifeline of any business, trade or profession.”

However, the Supreme Court drew a clear distinction between the three categories of persons who trade in cryptocurrency as a hobby as opposed to those who engage in trading in cryptocurrency as their business/occupation. The Supreme Court held that the first category who buys and sells cryptocurrency as a mere hobby cannot base their claim on Article 19(1)(g) as it only covers trade, occupation, profession or business.

The Supreme Court further held that the second category of citizens those who trade in cryptocurrency cannot also claim that the circular had the effect of completely shutting down their businesses, as they could still continue trading in “crypto-to-crypto” pairs or use the currencies stored in their wallets to make payments for the purchase of goods and services to those who are prepared to accept them, within India or abroad. Therefore, it is only the third category i.e., cryptocurrency exchanges that suffered due to the circular, as they had no other means of survival if they were disconnected from banking channels.

Though the RBI was held to be within its rights to issue the circular, the factor that led to the striking down of the circular was the lack of proof of the “proportional damage” suffered by RBI regulated entities in dealing with businesses operating in cryptocurrencies. The Supreme Court observed that the circular disconnected the banking sector from cryptocurrency exchanges despite the RBI not having found anything wrong with the functioning of these exchanges. It was also noted that before issuing the circular, the RBI did not explore the availability of alternative and less intrusive measures such as regulating cryptocurrency trading and cryptocurrency exchanges.

Though the judgment has provided temporary relief, there is currently an absence of definitive regulation on the cryptocurrency market. In light of such a vacuum, it is unlikely that financial institutions and the banking sector would be inclined towards investing in virtual currencies.

The wide-scale use of cryptocurrency also seems to be questionable, as the “Banning of Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill 2019” has been proposed with the aim to ban all private cryptocurrencies. Though the Indian Parliament is yet to approve this bill, it would be interesting to think through the role of digital currencies in the post-COVID-19 economy.

Source: www.cnbctv18.com

Author: Sawant Singh


Reddit's big cryptocurrency move is an exciting test

Reddit’s big cryptocurrency move is an exciting test

Reddit has finally made a move to tokenize its community points system, unveiling a beta test of two tokens based on the Ethereum network. The trial will initially roll out to two subreddits—r/cryptocurrency and r/FortniteBR—with more than two million subscribers between them. 

While Facebook and Telegram have either delayed or cancelled their cryptocurrency projects, Reddit is going full steam ahead. While smaller than Facebook, the app is a similar size to Telegram, and has 430 million users. Out of its users, 64% are aged between 18–24 and 69% of them are male—an audience known to be interested in cryptocurrency. If this trial is successful, it could send a clear message to other apps around the world that they should follow in its stead. And at the same time, it’s an exciting test for crypto in the real world. 

Rumours of Reddit getting into cryptocurrency first spread in early April. Some users were able to access a wallet system which contained hints about the project. At the time, Reddit said it was working with one community on the offering. Yesterday, much more information was released.

In a somewhat tongue-in-cheek slide presentation, the social media platform relayed its vision for a new frontier: a free and fair Internet. It claims the Internet has been ruined by advertising, censorship and “walled gardens” hoping that cryptocurrency might offer a way out.

The beta test is currently in operation through summer 2020. The new system will start with two communities—r/CryptoCurrency and r/FortniteBR—with tokens aptly named “Moon” and “Bricks,” respectively. Fortnite is a popular online video game.

As for what tools could achieve such an undertaking, Reddit offers up its “Community points.” Much in the same way as the existing karma, or Reddit gold systems, community points are used as a measure of reputation within the community—earned by submitting quality posts and comments. But unlike the current system, these tokens are running on a blockchain—and have some fancy features.

The Community Points are ERC-20 tokens on the Ethereum blockchain, in the same way that many tokens were created during the ICO craze. They act as a way for Redditors to “own” a piece of their favorite communities. And no one—not even Reddit moderators—can seize ownership of them.

Community Points are also redeemable, allowing access to “special memberships” and premium features, including gifs, custom emojis, and badges. On top of this, Reddit plans to introduce a “weighted voting” system, bolstering the votes of users with the most Community Points.

They’re also transferable via the Reddit Vault, which essentially acts as an Ethereum wallet. Same as with most cryptocurrencies, if you lose your private key to the vault, you lose your community points. As for who foots the bill for transaction fees, Reddit remarks that they’ll cover the costs, “for now.”

The Reddit presentation also mentions that “advanced users” can use other Ethereum tools if they so wish. Yet the success won’t be with the Ethereum diehards but with the thousands of new users just dipping their toes in the water.

Source: decrypt.co

Author: Decrypt / Will Heasman


Blockchain Technology – Best Cryptocurrencies on the Rise in LA

Blockchain Technology – Best Cryptocurrencies on the Rise in LA

Blockchain Technology – Is most referred as a decentralized, sharing register that records & track digital transactions. Blockchain Technology is the base platform for Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin Ethereum & the Telegram Blockchain known as TON. Discover the best Blockchain Easy Explanation.

We will be holding a seminar in LA, discussing how Blockchain Technology is being implemented in LA businesses such as healthcare, banking, insurance, and local services.

We will also be discussing some of the Cryptocurrencies on the rise in LA and how the LA economy can benefit from Blockchains and Cryptocurrency.

Implementing a blockchain to hoast a cryptocurrency is quite easy with Blockchain Technology Explained, plus, blockchain technology is being used more by LA companies and the general public.

Cryptocurrencies are a virtual currency and you can learn how does cryptocurrency works by checking out the Telegram Blockchain guide. You will learn about Cryptocurrencies on the Rise in LA and TON, known as, Telegram Tokens or Gram is being utilized by LA businesses and public.

Telegram Blockchain – Is the foundation for TON Cryptocurrency created by the Telegram messaging service! Telegram Blockchain is the new generation platform for blockchain contracts & cryptocurrency trading.

Learn all about TON Blockchain Technology and how the LA medical sector is considering using Blockchains to secure patient’s data and track prescriptions.

You will also discover how LA companies, in the movie and music industry is using Blockchain technology, Bitcoins, Ethereum and Telegram Coins, as an alternative way to secure assets.

Source: patch.com

Author: Added by Lennox Apts.


A place next to Satoshi: foundations of blockchain and cryptocurrency research in business and economics

A place next to Satoshi: foundations of blockchain and cryptocurrency research in business and economics

Blockchain technology has become an ubiquitous phenomenon. While the topic originated in computer science, the business and economics literature was comparatively slow to pick up on it. To better understand the academic basis, current developments and future research avenues of the discourse, 9672 cited references of 467 blockchain and cryptocurrency articles from the fields of business and economics are gathered from the Web of Science Core Collection and are analyzed. Five major strands of research are identified through factor analysis. They are reviewed and their interrelation is mapped using social network analysis. Research on (I) market efficiency and economics and (II) asset pricing and valuation is relatively mature and focuses on cryptocurrencies, while research on (III) the principles and applications of blockchain technology, (IV) transactions and anonymity and (V) monetary theory and policy lacks maturity. Potential paths for future research are pointed out and in conclusion, it is assessed that this young field of research still leaves plenty of room for manoeuvre. A scientific place next to Nakamoto (2008) is still available for existing, emerging and new research streams.

Over the last few years, blockchain technology has shown the potential to affect nearly all industries and sectors. While Bitcoin or, more generally, cryptocurrency was only its first application, the underlying blockchain technology offers much wider scope. The special feature of blockchain technology is that it is not an actual invention but ‘merely’ an intelligent concatenation of existing mechanisms, which include technical mechanisms but also economic incentive models. A wide range of possible applications and their (potential) consequences remain to be researched. While such a technical topic was predictably first embraced by computer scientists and engineers, the business, economics and finance literature has since discovered blockchain for itself and has been producing a steady flow of both empirical and theoretical contributions for several years now.

A systematic analysis of the field of blockchain research is a necessary first step to obtain a fundamental overview and to identify lines of research that may have been neglected or that may hold specific potential. This is done by co-citation analysis in the form of exploratory factor analysis to prevent subjectivity. In addition, it is identified, using social network analysis, how research directions change over time and how they are related to each other. After considering the research streams and the actual articles, a number of gaps in the existing research and, by implication, promising avenues for future research are pointed out.

Note that the term cryptocurrency refers not only to currencies but also to so-called tokens, which can be used for financing purposes or supply chain transparency, for example. The analysis explicitly includes cryptocurrency, not least because the terms blockchain and Bitcoin were used somewhat interchangeably until recently, with early research in this area referring to Bitcoin throughout.

The paper proceeds as follows: Related work is described in the “Related work” Section. The “Methodology” Section presents the methodology in terms of data collection and analysis. The “Findings on research streams” Section contains the results, providing an initial overview and then going into detail regarding the development of the five identified research streams. “Social network analysis” Section specifically presents the results of the social network analysis. The “Discussion” Section discusses the results, including limitations and future research avenues. Finally, the “Conclusion” Section contains a brief conclusion.

The data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection in July 2019. To capture all publications on blockchain and cryptocurrencies, the search term TS = (blockchain* OR distributed ledger* OR cryptocurrenc* OR bitcoin*) is used. Only peer-reviewed articles in the fields of business, finance and economics published after 2007 were considered. The extracted sample comprised 494 articles. (Without the discipline constraint, 2132 articles were obtained, with computer science and engineering accounting for most of the additional papers.) 27 articles proved to be unrelated to blockchain and cryptocurrency, so the final record contains 467 articles, with references to 9672 sources. These sources then naturally also refer to dates prior to 2008 and only a part of them are peer-reviewed publications. The final list of the 467 articles can be retrieved under https://doi.org/10.17632/x5cstsscmz.1.

The first and largest strand of research deals with the market economics and efficiency of cryptocurrencies. It accounts for 36.65% of the variance in the sample and a percentage of 35.6% of all examined publications can be assigned to the stream, of which more than half have factor loadings above 0.7 and thus represent publications of high thematic fit. The second stream (12.15% of the variance) concerns asset valuation and price formation and consists of 26.4% of all articles (9.2% with factor loadings above 0.7). The third stream accounts for 5.52% of the variance and deals with the principles and applications of blockchain. A share of 12.1% of papers can be assigned to the stream, while 5.7% of the sample represent important publications. The fourth stream (5.04%) covers special properties of cryptocurrency transactions, such as anonymity or irreversibility, and their regulatory implications. It covers 8.6% of all publications analyzed in the factor analysis and has the smallest share of high-fit publications (3.4%). Lastly, the fifth stream accounts for 3.73% of the variance and deals with monetary theory and policy, such as the suitability of Bitcoin as a currency. It represents a share of 7.5% of all papers examined, of which 75% are highly relevant publications for the stream.

Figure 1 shows histograms of the distribution of factor loadings and factor scores for all five identified research streams. It can be seen that the distribution of factor loadings in streams I and II varies comparatively strongly, while a trend can be observed in the three following streams. There, the largest part of all loadings is found between − 0.1 and 0.1, which shows that factors are composed of only a few specific publications and that the majority of the remaining ones are hardly thematically related. Stream IV represents a special feature, which is expressed by the fact that the highest identified factor loadings is 0.78. In terms of factor scores, stream III with has an extremely high factor score of 9.75.

figure1

Distribution of factor loadings and factor scores across research streams. Frequencies are displayed on the y-axis, factor loadings and factor scores on the x-axis respectively

Table 2 shows the correlation coefficients among the five factors or research streams, as obtained via oblique rotation. Factors one and five exhibit negative coefficients throughout. The strongest positive correlation exists between streams II and IV, while the strongest negative correlation applies to the relationships between streams I and III, and II and V, respectively. This suggests that streams I and III as well as streams II and IV have little in common, while streams II and V have high similarity.

Figure 2 shows the relative development of the research streams over time based on the number of publications. For this purpose, every publication with more than three co-citations was assigned to one of the five streams or ‘other’, and the relative size of the six categories was graphed for each year or period.

figure2

Relative development of research stream publications over time

Note that the years before the publication of the Bitcoin whitepaper were grouped into a single period, as were the years 2008 to 2011, because of the very low number of publications prior to 2012. Research stream I has been gaining ground steadily since 2014 and by 2018 accounted for 92.3% of the research on blockchain and cryptocurrencies examined here. The streams on ‘transactions and anonymity’ and ‘monetary theory and policy’ hit their peak importance in the period 2012 to 2014, while ‘blockchain basics’ peaked in 2015/16. Stream II accounted for a consistently large share.

The following subsections describe each of the research streams in detail before their interrelations are analyzed via social network analysis.

The second research stream accounts for 12.15% of the variance. This stream is somewhat similar to the first one, not least with regard to its set of contributors. In comparison to stream I, however, the publications are older, and several articles do not explicitly refer to cryptocurrencies but merely provide a basis for such studies. The overall theme of the stream can be summarized as asset valuation and price formation. The discourse tackles the question of how cryptocurrency prices can be explained and determined. The ten most important publications of the stream based on factor loadings are presented in Table 4. There is no trend regarding the outlets of publication, as all twelve papers were published in different journals.

The fourth research stream consists of 10 articles and explains 5.04% of the variance. These ten publications are listed in Table 6 along with 3 additional papers with high factor scores. This research stream primarily deals with the fundamental properties of cryptocurrency, in particular transactions, irreversibility and (pseudo-)‌anonymity, and their consequences. This includes for example the possibility of secure online peer-to-peer payment or the risks associated with digital currency, such as money laundering. Potential solutions and regulatory approaches are discussed. Most of the publications are from the period 2012 to 2014 and cover either legal or technical aspects. No two papers were published in the same outlet, as shown below the table.

The fifth research stream explains 3.73% of the variance and consists of 10 articles plus three additional ones with high factor scores (cf. Table 7). The basic theme of the discourse is monetary theory, economics and policy. The network of authors is comparatively small. George Selgin and Randall Wright authored three publications, and William J. Luther contributed to four.

Having identified the most relevant research streams on blockchain and cryptocurrency in the areas of business and economics, the question arises how they are related. Social network analysis can serve to visualize the connections within and between the research streams. The results are shown in Fig. 3. The frequency of citation, a metric for the relevance of a publication, is represented by the size of the nodes. Each node is colored according to the research stream it is associated with, i.e. with respect to which it has a factor score of 0.4 or more. If a paper exceeds that value with respect to several factors, it is assigned where the factor score is greatest. The nodes (publications) are linked by a line in case of five or more co-citations.

figure3

Visualization of research stream interrelations. The size of a node represents the absolute number of citations, lines between articles represent five co-citations between articles. For readability, only relationships ≥ 5 and only first authors are shown. Color represents research stream affiliation of nodes. Created with UCINET software

Various methods and economic theories are identified as formative literature. For example, GARCH models in stream II and economic theory in stream IV seem to be of high relevance. A partial absence, or rather wide spread across different methods and theories is observed, which can be an indication that the scientific discourse is still so young that researchers can apply a variety of methods. It is possible to refer to different theories. This may consolidate in the future if the streams continue to grow or split up into subcategories.

In the emerging field of blockchain principles and applications, original fundamental research is only just beginning to replace the Bitcoin whitepaper, which continues to be of great importance. At present, the outstanding articles of the stream consist of economic and technical fundamentals as well as introductory literature (in the form of books). Blockchain and cryptocurrencies are constantly changing, and the existing basic literature (e.g. Swan 2015; Tapscott and Tapscott 2018) may soon become outdated, if that has not already happened. The stream may split into various more specialised streams in the future, including application-specific streams.

While more developed discourses will have peer-reviewed articles as their formative works, this is not the case for research on blockchain and its application, nor for transactions and anonymity. Most publications in stream IV date from 2013/14, which may mean that most relevant findings were published then and scientific progress has slowed down. However, it is much more likely that this branch of research has been neglected (by peer-reviewed research). This does not necessarily apply to other scientific fields like computer science or engineering that have not been examined here. In this respect, there is an opportunity to gain a foothold within the stream and to shape its further development, for example through the systematic processing, review, presentation or transfer of the technical literature.

This study is subject to some limitations, of which only the most relevant ones can be mentioned here. In line with common practice in the literature, the data were collected exclusively from the Web of Science. While many comparable databases exist, which might have yielded additional papers, they were not used for technical reasons (ease of data export). Furthermore, research on blockchain and cryptocurrencies is also published outside of peer-reviewed journals (cf. e.g. the seminal whitepapers). Therefore, it is likely that the search of the Web of Science will have missed some important contributions. Finally, the choice of search terms of course shaped the results and is open to debate.

Figure 2 shows very clearly that research on market economics and efficiency has increased dramatically in relation to the other areas since 2014. However, this is probêably due not only to the relevance of the topic but also to comparatively swift channels of publication (e.g. via research letters or notes). Research in the other streams should in principle be similarly far-reaching, which indicates potential research gaps.

Three of the five streams appear to still be developing, which suggests a wealth of starting points in these areas. While this article has focused on the sources underlying the 467 scientific publications, trends for future research can also be derived from this core sample of papers. Several research clusters within this set could develop into research streams in their own right. So far, there are no dedicated streams on application areas, management or entrepreneurship. If and when such streams arise, this will be a good opportunity for enterprising researchers.

Adhami, S., Giudici, G., & Martinazzi, S. (2018). Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. Journal of Economics and Business,100, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.04.001.

Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,24(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12093.

Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157.

Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2006). Venture capital in emerging economies: networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,30(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00122.x.

  • Aiyagari, S. R., & Wallace, N. (1997). Government transaction policy, the medium of exchange, and welfare. Journal of Economic Theory,74(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.2250.

    • MathSciNet
    • MATH
    • Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Rodriguez, E., & Ibarra-Valdez, C. (2018). Long-range correlations and asymmetry in the Bitcoin market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,492, 948–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.025.

      Andoni, M., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Abram, S., Geach, D., Jenkins, D., et al. (2019). Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,100, 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014.

    • Ante, L. (2018). Cryptocurrency, Blockchain and Crime. In K. McCarthy (Ed.), The Money Laundering Market: Regulating the Criminal Economy (pp. 171–198). Agenda Publishing. doi:10.2307/j.ctv5cg8z1.10

    • Ante, L. (2019). Market reaction to exchange listings of cryptocurrencies.. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19924.76161.

      Ante, L., & Fiedler, I. (2019). Cheap signals in security token offerings (STOs).. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3356303.

      Ante, L., Fiedler, I., von Meduna, M., & Steinmetz, F. (2020). Returns from investing in cryptocurrency: evidence from german individual investors.. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540876.

    • Ante, L., & Meyer, A. (2019). Cross-listings of blockchain-based tokens issued through initial coin offerings: do liquidity and specific cryptocurrency exchanges matter? doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.27494.37442

    • Ante, L., Sandner, P., & Fiedler, I. (2018). Blockchain-based ICOs: pure hype or the dawn of a new era of startup financing? Journal of Risk and Financial Management,11(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm11040080.

      Apte, S., & Petrovsky, N. (2016). Will blockchain technology revolutionize excipient supply chain management? Journal of Excipients and Food Chemicals,7(3), 76–78.

      Aron, J. (2012). BitCoin software finds new life. New Scientist,213(2847), 20.

      Ashta, A., & Biot-Paquerot, G. (2018). FinTech evolution: Strategic value management issues in a fast changing industry. Strategic Change,27(4), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2203.

      Atzori, M. (2017). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary? Journal of Governance and Regulation,6(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v6_i1_p5.

    • Back, A. (2002). Hashcash – a denial of service counter-measure. www.hashcash.org/hashcash.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2019

    • Bariviera, A. F. (2017). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach. Economics Letters,161, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.013.

      • MathSciNet
      • Bariviera, A. F., Basgall, M. J., Hasperué, W., & Naiouf, M. (2017). Some stylized facts of the Bitcoin market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,484, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.04.159.

      • Batubara, F. R., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2018). Challenges of Blockchain Technology Adoption for e-Government: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age. ACM.

      • Baur, D. G., Dimpfl, T., & Kuck, K. (2018a). Bitcoin, gold and the US dollar—A replication and extension. Finance Research Letters,25, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.10.012.

        Baur, D. G., Hong, K. H., & Lee, A. D. (2018b). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money,54, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004.

        Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review,45(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00244.x.

        Baur, D. G., & McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance,34(8), 1886–1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.008.

      • Bayer, D., Haber, S., & Stornetta, S. W. (1993). Improving the efficiency and reliability of digital time-stamping. Sequences,II, 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9323-8_24.

        • MATH
        • Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega,34(4), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.12.002.

          Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives,29(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.213.

        • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard MA: analytical technologies, 6.

        • Bouoiyour, J., Aviral, R., Tiwari, K., & Olayeni, O. R. (2016). What drives Bitcoin price? Economics Bulletin,36(2), 843–850.

        • Bouoiyour, J., & Selmi, R. (2015). What does Bitcoin look like? In Handbook of digital currency (pp. 31–43).

        • Bouri, E., Molnár, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D., & Hagfors, L. I. (2017). On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Research Letters,20, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.025.

          Brauneis, A., & Mestel, R. (2018). Price discovery of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond. Economics Letters,165, 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.001.

          Bryans, D. (2014). Bitcoin and money laundering: mining for an effective solution. Indiana Law Journal,89(1), 441–472.

          Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wassermann, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

          Carter, R., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. The Journal of Finance,45(4), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02426.x.

          Castro, M., & Liskov, B. (1999). Practical byzantine fault tolerance. OSDI,99, 173–186.

        • Caytas, J. D. (2016). Developing blockchain real-time clearing and settlement in the EU, U.S., and globally.

        • Cecchetti, S., & Schienholtz, K. (2019). Libra: A dramatic call to regulatory action. VOX CEPR Policy Portal. Retrieved 31 Aug 2019 from: https://voxeu.org/article/libra-dramatic-call-regulatory-action.

        • Certo, S. T., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2001). Signaling firm value through board structure: an investigation of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,26(2), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102600202.

        • Chaum, D. (2012). Advances in Cryptology: proceedings of Crypto. Springer Science & Business Media.

        • Cheah, E. T., & Fry, J. (2015). Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin. Economics Letters,130, 32–36.

          • MathSciNet
          • MATH
          • Cheah, E. T., Mishra, T., Parhi, M., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Long memory interdependency and inefficiency in Bitcoin markets. Economics Letters, 167, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.010.

            • MATH
            • Chen, Y., & Leimkuhler, F. F. (1986). A relationship between Lotka’s Law, Bradford’s Law, and Zipf’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,37(5), 307–314.

              Chen, Z., Li, Y., Wu, Y., & Luo, J. (2017). The transition from traditional banking to mobile internet finance: an organizational innovation perspective – a comparative study of Citibank and ICBC. Financial Innovation,3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0062-0.

              Chiu, J., & Koeppl, T. V. (2019). Blockchain-based settlement for asset trading. The Review of Financial Studies,32(5), 1716–1753. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy122.

              Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, D. (2016). The economics of BitCoin price formation. Applied Economics,48(19), 1799–1815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1109038.

              Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, D. (2018). Virtual relationships: Short- and long-run evidence from BitCoin and altcoin markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money,52, 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.11.001.

              Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Econometrica,4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036946.

              Cocco, L., Pinna, A., & Marchesi, M. (2017). Banking on blockchain: Costs savings thanks to the blockchain technology. Future Internet,9(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9030025.

              Colombo, M. G., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2019). Signaling in science-based IPOs: The combined effect of affiliation with prestigious universities, underwriters, and venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing,34(1), 141–177.

            • Conoscenti, M., Vetro, A., & De Martin, J. C. (2017). Blockchain for the Internet of Things: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA (pp. 1–6). IEEE. doi:10.1109/AICCSA.2016.7945805

            • Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019). Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis,62, 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003.

              Corbet, S., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018a). Datestamping the Bitcoin and Ethereum bubbles. Finance Research Letters,26, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.12.006.

              Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018b). Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters,165, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.004.

              Dabbagh, M., Sookhak, M., & Safa, N. S. (2019). The evolution of blockchain: A bibliometric study. IEEE Access,7, 19212–19221. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895646.

              Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804.

            • Dai, W. (1998). b-money. Retrieved 9 Sep 2019 from: www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt.

            • DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilǎ, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation,14(1), 20.

              Donier, J., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2015). Why do markets crash? Bitcoin data offers unprecedented insights. PLoS ONE,10(10), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139356.

              Drobetz, W., Momtaz, P. P., & Schröder, H. (2019). Investor sentiment and initial coin offerings. The Journal of Alternative Investments,21(4), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2019.1.069.

              Dunphy, P., & Petitcolas, F. A. P. (2018). A first look at identity management schemes on the blockchain. IEEE Security and Privacy,16(4), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.3111247.

              Dwork, C., & Naor, M. (1992). Pricing via processing or combatting junk mail. Annual International Cryptology Conference (pp. 139–147). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

              Dwyer, G. P. (2015). The economics of Bitcoin and similar private digital currencies. Journal of Financial Stability,17, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2014.11.006.

              Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016a). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters,16, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.008.

              Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016b). Hedging capabilities of bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold? Finance Research Letters,16, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.025.

            • Eichengreen, B. (2019). Libra: The known unknown and unknown unkowns. VOX CEPR Policy Portal. Retrieved 8 Sep 2019 from: https://voxeu.org/article/libra-known-unknowns-and-unknown-unknowns.

            • Engelhardt, M. A. (2017). Hitching healthcare to the chain: an introduction to blockchain technology in the healthcare sector. Technology Innovation Management Review,7(10), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1111.

            • Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,20(3), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487.

              • MathSciNet
              • Esposito, C., De Santis, A., Tortora, G., Chang, H., & Choo, K. K. R. (2018). Blockchain: A panacea for healthcare cloud-based data security and privacy? IEEE Cloud Computing,5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2018.011791712.

              • Eyal, I., & Sirer, E. G. (2014). Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In Eighteenth International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security.

              • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance,25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486.

                Fanning, K., & Centers, D. P. (2016). Blockchain and its coming impact on financial services. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance,27(5), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.

                Feng, W., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Informed trading in the Bitcoin market. Finance Research Letters,26, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.11.009.

              • Fiedler, I., Ante, L., Steinmetz, F., & Häseler, S. (2018). Distributed Ledger Technology: A Possible Way Forward for Securities Clearing. Binary District. Retrieved 8 Sep 2019 from: https://journal.binarydistrict.com/distributed-ledger-technology-a-possible-way-forward-for-securities-clearing/.

              • Firdaus, A., Razak, M. F. A., Feizollah, A., Hashem, I. A. T., Hazim, M., & Anuar, N. B. (2019). The rise of “blockchain”: bibliometric analysis of blockchain study. Scientometrics,120(3), 1289–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03170-4.

                Fisch, C. (2019). Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing,34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.007.

                Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics,2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2010002.

                Fry, J., & Cheah, E. T. (2016). Negative bubbles and shocks in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis,47, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.02.008.

                Gandal, N., Hamrick, J. T., Moore, T., & Oberman, T. (2018). Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics,95, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.12.004.

              • Gkillas, K., & Katsiampa, P. (2018). An application of extreme value theory to cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters,164, 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.020.

                • MATH
                • Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance,48(5), 1779–1801.

                  Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the fintech revolution: interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems,35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766.

                  Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory Factor Analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (pp. 231–258). Boston, MA: Springer, US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_6.

                  Governatori, G., Idelberger, F., Milosevic, Z., Riveret, R., Sartor, G., & Xu, X. (2018). On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law,26(4), 377–408.

                  Green, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Citizen utilities: The emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy,105(March), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.004.

                • Grossman, H. (1991). Monetary Economics – A Review Essay. National Bureau of Economic Research.

                • Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial Innovation,2(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0034-9.

                  Haber, S., & Stornetta, S. W. (1990). How to time-stamp a digital document. Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptography (pp. 437–455). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

                • Haber, S., & Stornetta, S. W. (1997). Secure names for bit-strings. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 28–35.

                • Harris, L. (1991). Stock price clustering and discreteness. Review of Financial Studies,4, 389–415.

                  Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018). The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,29, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005.

                  Hayes, A. S. (2017). Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics,34(7), 1308–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.005.

                  Hendrickson, J. R., Hogan, T. L., & Luther, W. J. (2016). The political economy of bitcoin. Economic Inquiry,54(2), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12291.

                  Holub, M., & Johnson, J. (2018). Bitcoin research across disciplines. Information Society,34(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414094.

                  Hurst, H. E. (1951). Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,116, 770–808.

                  Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, H. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review,95(1), 118–127.

                  Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm managerial behaviour, ageny costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,3, 305–360.

                  Kaiser, H. F. (1959). Computer program for varimax rotation in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement,19(3), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316445901900314.

                • Karafiloski, E., & Mishev, A. (2017). Blockchain solutions for big data challenges: A literature review. In 17th IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies, EUROCON 2017 – Conference Proceedings (pp. 763–768). doi:10.1109/EUROCON.2017.8011213

                • Katsiampa, P. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters,158, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.023.

                  • MathSciNet
                  • MATH
                  • Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018). IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems,82, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022.

                    Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2018). Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management,25(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1424.

                    Kim, S., & Sarin, A. (2019). Distributed ledger and blockchain technology: framework and use cases. Journal of Investment Management. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3373347.

                    Kim, T. (2017). On the transaction cost of Bitcoin. Finance Research Letters,23, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.014.

                  • King, M. (2016). The institutions of monetary policy. The American Economic Review,94(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301957.

                    • MathSciNet
                    • Kirzner, I. M. (1985). The Perils of Regulation: A Market-Process Approach. In Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

                      Kiyotaki, B. N., & Wright, R. (2016). A search-theoretic approach to monetary economics. The American Economic Review,83(1), 63–77.

                      Klarin, A. (2020). The decade-long cryptocurrencies and the blockchain rollercoaster: Mapping the intellectual structure and charting future directions. Research in International Business and Finance,51, 101067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101067.

                      Kristoufek, L. (2013). BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era. Scientific Reports,3, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03415.

                      Kristoufek, L. (2015). What are the main drivers of the bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. PLoS ONE,10(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123923.

                      Kristoufek, L. (2018). On Bitcoin markets (in)efficiency and its evolution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,503, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.161.

                    • Krugman, P. (2013). Bitcoin Is Evil. The New York Times. Retrieved 4 Sep 2019 from: https//krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/.

                    • Kuntner, T., & Teichert, T. (2016). The scope of price promotion research: An informetric study. Journal of Business Research,69(8), 2687–2696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.004.

                      Lagos, R., & Wright, R. (2005). A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis. Journal of Political Economy,113(3), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1086/429804.

                    • Lahmiri, S., Bekiros, S., & Salvi, A. (2018). Long-range memory, distributional variation and randomness of bitcoin volatility. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals,107, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.12.018.

                      • MathSciNet
                      • Lamport, L., Shostak, R., & Pease, M. (1982). The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS),4(3), 382–401.

                        • MATH
                        • Li, Y., & Wright, R. (1998). Government transaction policy, media of exchange, and prices. Journal of Economic Theory,81(2), 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2363.

                          • MATH
                          • Liang, X., Zhao, J., Shetty, S., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2018). Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications. IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, 2017-October, 1–5. doi:10.1109/PIMRC.2017.8292361

                          • Libra Association. (2019). An Introduction to Libra. Retrieved 15 Sep 2019 from: https://libra.org/en-US/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2019/06/LibraWhitePaper_en_US.pdf.

                          • Liu, J. (2016). Bitcoin Literature: a Co-Word Analysis. In 6th Economics & Finance Conference, OECD: Paris (pp. 262–272). doi:10.20472/efc.2016.006.013

                          • Luther, W. J. (2013). Friedman versus Hayek on private outside monies: New evidence for the debate. Economic Affairs,33(1), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12001.

                            Luther, W. J. (2016). Bitcoin and the future of digital payments. The Independent Review,20(3), 397–404.

                            Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance,7(1), 77–91.

                          • Massias, H., Avila, X. S., & Quisquater, J. J. (1999). Design of a secure timestamping service with minimal trust requirement. In The 20th Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux.

                          • Maurer, B., Nelms, T. C., & Swartz, L. (2013). When perhaps the real problem is money itself!: The practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics,23(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.777594.

                            McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(6), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6%3c433:AID-ASI11%3e3.0.CO;2-Q.

                            McConaghy, M., McMullen, G., Parry, G., McConaghy, T., & Holtzman, D. (2017). Visibility and digital art: Blockchain as an ownership layer on the Internet. Strategic Change,26(5), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2146.

                          • Meiklejohn, S., Pomarole, M., Jordan, G., Levchenko, K., McCoy, D., Voelker, G. M., & Savage, S. (2013). A fistful of Bitcoins: Characterizing payments among men with no names. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference. ACM (pp. 127–140). doi:10.1145/2896384

                          • Merediz-Solá, I., & Bariviera, A. F. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Research in International Business and Finance,50(June), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.008.

                          • Merkle, R. C. (1980). Protocols for public key cryptosystems. Proceedings – IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy,122–134, https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.1980.10006.

                          • Meyer, A., & Ante, L. (2020). Effects of initial coin offering characteristics on cross-listing returns.. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10972.33920.

                            Miau, S., & Yang, J. M. (2018). Bibliometrics-based evaluation of the Blockchain research trend: 2008–March 2017. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,30(9), 1029–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1434138.

                          • Miller, M. (1997). The Future of Law. In paper delivered at the Extro (p. 3).

                          • Mollick, E. R. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing,29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005.

                            Nadarajah, S., & Chu, J. (2017). On the inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters,150, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.033.

                          • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved 12 June 2019 from: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

                          • Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal,29(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.659.

                            O’Shields, R. (2017). Smart contracts: Legal agreements for the blockchain. North Carolina Banking Institute,21(1), 177–194.

                            Ober, M., Katzenbeisser, S., & Hamacher, K. (2013). Structure and anonymity of the bitcoin transaction graph. Future Internet,5(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi5020237.

                            Oh, S.-C., Kim, M.-S., Park, Y., Roh, G.-T., & Lee, C.-W. (2017). Implementation of blockchain-based energy trading system. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,11(3), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-12-2017-037.

                            Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly,34(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007.

                            Pazaitis, A., De Filippi, P., & Kostakis, V. (2017). Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: The illustrative case of Backfeed. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,125, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.025.

                            Phillip, A., Chan, J., & Peiris, S. (2018). A new look at cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters,163, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.020.

                          • Reid, F., & Harrigan, M. (2013). An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. Security and Privacy in Social Networks,197–223, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4139-7_10.

                          • Reuters. (2019). China says new digital currency will be similar to Facebook’s Libra. Reuters. Retrieved 4 Sep 2019 from: www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cryptocurrency-cenbank/china-says-new-digital-currency-will-be-similar-to-facebooks-libra.

                          • Rogojanu, A., & Badea, L. (2014). The issue of competing currencies: Case study—Bitcoin. Theoretical and Applied Economics,21(1), 103–114.

                          • Ron, D., & Shamir, A. (2014). Quantitative Analysis of the Full Bitcoin Transaction Graph. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978–3–642-39884-1

                          • Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2019). The role of smart contracts in sustainability: Worldwide research trends. Sustainability,11(11), 3049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113049.

                          • Salter, A. W., & Luther, W. J. (2014). Synthesizing state and spontaneous order theories of money. In Entangled Political Economy (pp. 161–178). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

                          • Schmitz, J., & Leoni, G. (2019). Accounting and auditing at the time of blockchain technology: A research agenda. Australian Accounting Review,29(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12286.

                            Seebacher, S., & Schüritz, R. (2017). Blockchain technology as an enabler of service systems: A structured literature review. International Conference on Exploring Services Science (pp. 12–23). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_2.

                            Selgin, G. (1994). On ensuring the acceptability of a new fiat money. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,26(4), 808–826. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077948.

                            Selgin, G. (2002). Adaptive learning and the transition to fiat money. The Economic Journal,113(484), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00094.

                            Selgin, G. (2015). Synthetic commodity money. Journal of Financial Stability,17, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2014.07.002.

                            Shermin, V. (2017). Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strategic Change,26(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2150.

                            Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,24, 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406.

                            Small, H. G. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science,7(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700202.

                            Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820924.

                            Stokes, R. (2012). Virtual money laundering: The case of Bitcoin and the Linden dollar. Information and Communications Technology Law,21(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2012.744225.

                            Sun, J., Yan, J., & Zhang, K. Z. K. (2016). Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. Financial Innovation,2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0040-y.

                          • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

                          • Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday, 2(9). doi:10.5210/fm.v2i9.548

                          • Tan, B. S., & Low, K. Y. (2019). Blockchain as the database engine in the accounting system. Australian Accounting Review,29(2), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12278.

                          • Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2018). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is changing the world. Portfolio.

                          • Taylor, P. J., Dargahi, T., Dehghantanha, A., Parizi, R. M., & Choo, K. K. R. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain cyber security. Digital Communications and Networks, (June 2018). doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2019.01.005

                          • Tiwari, A. K., Jana, R. K., Das, D., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Informational efficiency of Bitcoin – An extension. Economics Letters,163, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.12.006.

                            Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management,14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.

                          • Tsai, W. T., Deng, E., Ding, X., & Li, J. (2018). Application of blockchain to trade clearing. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security Companion (pp. 154–163). IEEE. doi:10.1109/QRS-C.2018.00039

                          • Urquhart, A. (2016). The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters,148, 80–82.

                          • Urquhart, A. (2017). Price clustering in Bitcoin. Economics Letters,159, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.035.

                            • MATH
                            • Urquhart, A. (2018). What causes the attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters,166, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.017.

                              Veuger, J. (2012). Trust in a viable real estate economy with disruption and blockchain. Facilities,36(1/2), 103–120.

                            • Vishnumurthy, V., Chandrakumar, S., & Sirer, E. G. (2003). Karma: A secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing. Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-peer Systems, 35(6).

                            • Wei, W. C. (2018a). Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters,168, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.003.

                              Wei, W. C. (2018b). The impact of Tether grants on Bitcoin. Economics Letters,171, 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.07.001.

                              White, L. H. (2015). The market for cryptocurrencies. Cato Journal,35(2), 383–402.

                              Wolfond, G. (2017). A Blockchain ecosystem for digital identity: improving service delivery in Canada’s public and private sectors. Technology Innovation Management Review,7(10), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1112.

                              Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia.. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664.

                              Yang, D., & Li, M. (2018). Evolutionary approaches and the construction of technology-driven regulations. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,54(14), 3256–3271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1496422.

                              Yermack, D. (2015). Is Bitcoin a real currency? Handbook of Digital Currency. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2361599.

                              Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on Blockchain technology? – A systematic review. PLoS ONE,11(10), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163477.

                              Yonghong, J., He, N., & Weihua, R. (2018). Time-varying long-term memory in Bitcoin market. Finance Research Letters,25, 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.12.009.

                              Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016). Healthcare data gateways: found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control. Journal of Medical Systems,40(10), 218.

                            • Zeng, S., Ni, X., Yuan, Y., & Wang, F. Y. (2018). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Research. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings (pp. 102–107). IEEE. doi:10.1109/IVS.2018.8500606

                            • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods,18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.

                            • Zuschke, N. (2019). An analysis of process-tracing research on consumer decision-making. Journal of Business Research,1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028.

                            • Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. S. (2015). Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. In Proceedings – 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, SPW 2015 (pp. 180–184). doi:10.1109/SPW.2015.27

                            • Download references

                              Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

                            • Blockchain Research Lab, Colonnaden 72, Hamburg, 20354, Germany
                              • Lennart Ante
                              • Faculty of Business, Economics & Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146, Hamburg, Germany
                                • Lennart Ante
                                • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

                                  Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                                  Reprints and Permissions

                                  Download citation

                                  • Received: 02 December 2019

                                  • Published: 15 May 2020

                                  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03492-8

                                  • Distributed ledger
                                  • Bitcoin
                                  • Informetric analysis
                                  • Bibliometric analysis
                                  • Social network analysis

                                  Source: link.springer.com

                                  Author: Lennart Ante 
                                  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-71271,2


                                  Technical & Fundamental Analysis - Crypto, Page 1

                                  Technical & Fundamental Analysis – Crypto, Page 1

                                  IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS

                                  The content provided on the website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and contents provided by third parties, which are intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be read as, any recommendation or advice to take any action whatsoever, including to make any investment or buy any product. When making any financial decision, you should perform your own due diligence checks, apply your own discretion and consult your competent advisors. The content of the website is not personally directed to you, and we does not take into account your financial situation or needs.The information contained in this website is not necessarily provided in real-time nor is it necessarily accurate. Prices provided herein may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges.Any trading or other financial decision you make shall be at your full responsibility, and you must not rely on any information provided through the website. FX Empire does not provide any warranty regarding any of the information contained in the website, and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using any information contained in the website.The website may include advertisements and other promotional contents, and FX Empire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with the content. FX Empire does not endorse any third party or recommends using any third party’s services, and does not assume responsibility for your use of any such third party’s website or services.FX Empire and its employees, officers, subsidiaries and associates, are not liable nor shall they be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided on this website.

                                  RISK DISCLAIMER

                                  This website includes information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs) and other financial instruments, and about brokers, exchanges and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.FX Empire encourages you to perform your own research before making any investment decision, and to avoid investing in any financial instrument which you do not fully understand how it works and what are the risks involved.

                                  Source: www.fxempire.com

                                  Author: Bob Mason7 hours ago


                                  VIEW: Decoding the Supreme Court's cryptocurrency judgement

  • Leave a Comment