Good morning, afternoon and evening all. Any charts, technical analysis, trade ideas, thoughts, views, ForexLive traders would like to share and discuss with fellow ForexLive traders, please do so:
By Eamonn Sheridan Hockey is finally back, but we at Last Word on Hockey are still going to look back at each dateâ€™s historical significance to the game. Weâ€™ll remember the The changes states are scrambling to make ahead of November to help protect voters from COVID-19 could disproportionately disenfranchise people of color.
All the biggest trading floors in the world have screens locked on ForexLive™. We provide real-time forex news and analysis at the highest level while making it accessible for less-experienced traders.
Founded in 2008, ForexLive.com is the premier forex trading news site offering interesting commentary, opinion and analysis for true FX trading professionals. Get the latest breaking foreign exchange trade news and current updates from active traders daily. ForexLive.com blog posts feature leading edge technical analysis charting tips, forex analysis, and currency pair trading tutorials. Find out how to take advantage of swings in global foreign exchange markets and see our real-time forex news analysis and reactions to central bank news, economic indicators and world events.
Today in Hockey History: Edmonton Oilers Trade Wayne Gretzky to Los Angeles Kings |
Source : lastwordonhockey.com
Continue Reading » https://lastwordonhockey.com/2020/08/09/today-in-hockey-history-edmonton-oilers-trade-wayne-gretzky-to-los-angeles-kings/
A white person and a Black person vote by mail. Whose ballot is more likely to be rejected?
Jessica King’s absentee ballot application never arrived. She tried to vote early at her polling location near her home in Albany, Georgia — but left when the crowd made social distancing impossible.
Finally, thanks to an early alarm on Election Day and a nearly hourlong wait, King, 27, was able to vote in the state’s June primary.
The obstacles she encountered to safely casting a ballot several months into a pandemic were frustratingly familiar to her as a Black voter.
“As a person of color, the worry that my vote won’t get counted is always there,” King, who works at a nonprofit community advocacy group in Albany, said in an interview. “It’s not because we don’t trust the system, it’s because the experiences we have had. History has taught us that people of color — our vote does not get counted when it really matters.”
Voting by mail has been championed — rightly, experts say — as the safest way to participate in the 2020 election while the nation remains under threat from the coronavirus, which has killed more than 160,000 and sickened millions, with no end in sight. Many of those same experts have for years advocated the expansion of mail voting as a proven way to increase participation in a democracy where an estimated 43 percent of the eligible population, for one reason or another, does not vote.
But the changes that states are scrambling to make ahead of November to help protect voters from COVID-19 — expanding their mail and absentee voting systems while reducing the number of polling locations — risk supersizing the issues of racial discrimination and disenfranchisement that Black, Hispanic and other voters of color have already spent generations fighting.
The cause was dear to the late Rep. John Lewis, the longtime Democratic congressman from Georgia and a giant of the civil rights movement, who was beaten on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, for marching in support of voting rights in March of 1965 at a time when poll taxes and literacy tests were written into law.
Such rampant discrimination across the country was ultimately met with the landmark Voting Rights Act 55 years ago, which devoted significant federal resources to enfranchise Black voters when the states wouldn’t. Federal examiners went to the South, registering tens of thousands of Black voters when county clerks refused. States and counties with a history of discrimination were required to prove to the Department of Justice that new election rules wouldn’t disenfranchise voters of color.
For the next half-century, civil rights leaders, voting rights advocates and the Department of Justice fought to make more fair an election system designed for white landowning men.
And while Black voters no longer must guess the number of jelly beans in a jar to cast a ballot, inequality persists. States have put in place voter ID requirements and restrictive voting laws that disproportionately make it harder for people of color to vote, while persistent gerrymandering dilutes the power of voters.
In 2013, the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, allowing states and counties with a history of discrimination to run their elections without federal oversight. More than 1,600 polling places closed between 2012 and 2018 in those areas, without federal oversight. Many states have worked to aggressively purge their voter rolls, while other states have deployed new and restrictive laws in the name of preventing fraud, despite the lack of evidence that fraud pervades American elections.
And then came the COVID-19 pandemic, ravaging an ill-prepared country and dashing plans for a normal Election Day.
Now, advocates fear that voting changes will put the Black and Latino people suffering the most in the pandemic at risk of losing their voting rights. Young, diverse Americans who have spent the summer mobilizing for racial justice may face the highest barriers to participation, not to mention the millions of Americans facing evictions this summer, for whom voting by mail may well be impossible.
“If we don’t do anything differently now, we’re going to see not only dramatic racial disparities, but also just large-scale disenfranchisement across the board,” said Wendy Weiser, vice president of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at the NYU School of Law. “There’s disparities at every step of the process and they’re going to be really exacerbated — they’re already being exacerbated — by the coronavirus.”
Both major political parties, along with advocates including the American Civil Liberties Union, the League of Women Voters, and the NAACP have launched a barrage of lawsuits over how absentee rules are used and updated. Republicans, led by President Donald Trump, are raising the alarm over the threat of voter fraud, which is unproven, and have rushed to defend existing laws, while Democrats, who have reliably enjoyed the support of the groups most at risk of disenfranchisement, say they’ll spare no expense to enfranchise more people.
“This is maybe the biggest election administration challenge of our lifetimes,” Dale Ho, director of the ACLU Voting Rights Project, said.
As many as 64 percent of Americans are expected to vote by mail this year, according to a group of researchers at Harvard, Northeastern, and Rutgers universities, as well as the Harvard Medical School. That’s a huge increase over the 23 percent who voted by mail in 2018, according to census data.
Advocates like Ho have been pushing to increase voting access this way for years, but many worry the nation is botching the rollout: Congress has so far offered up just $400 million in additional election funding despite estimates that states need $4 billion in federal funding to manage safe, mail-heavy elections. House Democrats included $3.6 billion for election funding as part of a $3 trillion coronavirus relief package the chamber passed in May, but Senate Republicans have been resistant to providing local governments with cash to help conduct elections.
“We are stress-testing all the institutions of democracy at once,” said Justin Levitt, a former Justice Department voting rights official and a professor at the Loyola Law School.
In a pandemic, voting by mail appears an obvious choice to simultaneously preserve access to the polls and public health. Western states such as California, Oregon and Colorado have been doing it for years, but in practice across the country, voting by mail — most commonly known as absentee voting — disproportionately benefits certain groups of voters.
Older, white voters are significantly more likely to vote by mail and have those ballots counted, studies show, while voters of color and younger voters are significantly more likely to have their ballots rejected.
“Nobody has closely scrutinized the fairness of absentee voting rules because most people weren’t voting by mail ballot and most people have reasonable, alternative voting methods without risking their lives,” Weiser said.
Daniel A. Smith, a political science professor at the University of Florida, has been examining the effects of mail election regulations this year. In April, he co-published a paper reporting that Hispanic and Black voters were more than twice as likely to have their ballot rejected as white voters in Florida’s 2018 general election. In May, he co-published a review of Georgia’s 2018 midterm election data that found a similar pattern of rejection for voters of color. For example, in Gwinnett County, the second most-populous county in Georgia, some 4 percent of white voters’ absentee ballots were rejected, while 8 percent of black voters’ absentee ballots were rejected.
“We’re in a crazy world where there’s this trade-off between our health and our vote. I understand completely why people want to vote by mail — it’s by far the safest method of voting. But it’s one that’s not costless,” he said.
Smith said he plans to vote in person in November. “I’ll don my PPE,” he said, referring to personal protective equipment.
The U.S. Election Assistance Commission estimates the national average absentee ballot rejection is 1.4 percent, while states that vote in all-mail elections have rates lower than 1 percent. But in primary races during the pandemic so far, states and counties are seeing higher than normal absentee ballot rejection rates. In New York City, 21 percent of mail-in ballots were rejected, according to city election data.
Smith’s research — which is ongoing — has found that people of color, younger voters and those who have never voted by mail are significantly more likely to have their ballots rejected, and that the inconsistent rejection rates within states suggest institutional issues are to blame, not voter error.
“You have some counties where the rejection rates for younger voters or black voters is upwards of 4 percent,” he said of his research in Florida, where he lives. “You have other jurisdictions where it’s one-tenth of 1 percent. Voters do not become more intelligent or less intelligent about how to vote a ballot moving across a county line. There are institutional factors in play.”
The most common reason ballots are rejected is that they arrive late. Mail service is less reliable in lower-income communities, and many Native American reservations do not have home delivery addresses used for mail voting. The pandemic has stressed mail service across the board, and amid the fiscal crisis, the U.S. Postal Service has ordered recent changes that are expected to slow the mail service.
Another factor? Stamps. By law, 17 states cover voters’ return postage, while the majority of states do not. Some states, including Pennsylvania, have decided to foot the bill for postage for the presidential election. But there are inconsistencies within states, too. In Florida and Michigan, some counties have said they’ll pay for postage, while voters elsewhere must find their own stamps.
People’s lack of experience in absentee voting is another data point that worries advocates. People who have never voted absentee are also more likely to make unconscious mistakes, voting rights advocates said, and historically, Black voters have largely chosen to cast their ballots in person. Census data indicates that in 2018, 24 percent of white voters cast a ballot by mail compared to just 11 percent of Black voters.
Experience does not appear to be a fail-safe factor, however. Asian voters choose mail voting more than other racial groups, with 41 percent of Asian voters casting ballots by mail in 2018, according to census data. Still, there’s evidence that the ballots of Asian voters are rejected at higher rates, too.
Voter education, too, varies greatly between parties and among locations. The president, trailing Joe Biden in the polls, has regularly used Twitter, campaign and White House events to falsely claim that mail voting is riddled with fraud and that an election reliant on it is one that will be “rigged” against him — except in Florida, thanks to its Republican governor. Republicans believe him: in a recent ABC News/Washington Post survey in July, 78 percent of Trump supporters said mail voting was “vulnerable to significant levels of fraud.”
And finally, bias shows up in election administration itself. Studies find that voters with putatively Hispanic names are less likely to have election questions answered by officials, and that Black and Hispanic voters were more likely to be asked for voter ID at the polls.
When it comes to mail voting, names and addresses can suggest race and create opportunities for implicit bias or added scrutiny. In Georgia, Democratic officials said that election officials can access a voter’s race when they’re checking for a signature match. The state party successfully sued to require multiple poll workers to sign off on a signature mismatch, which they hope will reduce bias.
Advocates of mail voting say that the practice doesn’t have to disenfranchise voters of color. When Colorado moved to all-mail voting in 2013, one study by researchers at Stanford University, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Washington found that turnout rose among all groups, particularly in historically disenfranchised groups like voters of color.
But without data examining rejection rates by race, Smith cautions it’s not yet known if these problems persist in other all-mail states, too.
Advocates of mail voting say key reforms — including using software for signature verification, voter roll maintenance, automatic voter registration and giving people a chance to fix ballots with errors — can cut down on bias and disenfranchisement. Everyone agrees public education efforts by campaigns and public officials would help, too.
But with just weeks until voters start casting their ballots, time is running out to make changes.
“From our perspective, we just want voters to have a choice,” the ACLU’s Ho said. “I look and see at what happened in Georgia, with people voting after … midnight during a pandemic, and we just can’t have that.”
In Georgia, a shortage of poll workers — who are usually senior citizens — led to last-minute closures, creating long lines and crowds at other locations. Some polling places saw their hours extended, while some voters still in line when the polls closed waited deep into the night to cast their ballots.
King, the voter in Georgia who encountered numerous hurdles during the primary, said she heard members of her community complain of malfunctioning technology, long lines and long drives. One of her friends waited more than two hours to vote.
“I kept thinking, ‘I don’t know if I would have made it that long,’” she said. “To me, voter discouragement is voter suppression.”
Author: Jane C. Timm
Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Covid-19 Impact
Overview for “Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market” Helps in providing scope and definitions, Key Findings, Growth Drivers, and Various Dynamics.
The Wearable Health Tracking Devices market is expected to grow from USD X.X million in 2020 to USD X.X million by 2026, at a CAGR of X.X% during the forecast period. The global Wearable Health Tracking Devices market report is a comprehensive research that focuses on the overall consumption structure, development trends, sales models and sales of top countries in the global Wearable Health Tracking Devices market. The report focuses on well-known providers in the global Wearable Health Tracking Devices industry, market segments, competition, and the macro environment.
A holistic study of the market is made by considering a variety of factors, from demographics conditions and business cycles in a particular country to market-specific microeconomic impacts. The study found the shift in market paradigms in terms of regional competitive advantage and the competitive landscape of major players.
Download PDF Sample of Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market report @ https://www.arcognizance.com/enquiry-sample/1197723
Brief about Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Report with [email protected] https://www.arcognizance.com/report/global-wearable-health-tracking-devices-market-report-2020-by-key-players-types-applications-countries-market-size-forecast-to-2026-based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread
Single User License Copy and Other Purchase [email protected] https://www.arcognizance.com/purchase/1197723
Some Point of Table of Content:
Chapter One: Report Overview
Chapter Two: Global Market Growth Trends
Chapter Three: Value Chain of Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market
Chapter Four: Players Profiles
Chapter Five: Global Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Analysis by Regions
Chapter Six: North America Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Analysis by Countries
Chapter Seven: Europe Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Analysis by Countries
Chapter Eight: Asia-Pacific Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Analysis by Countries
Chapter Nine: Middle East and Africa Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Analysis by Countries
Chapter Ten: South America Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Analysis by Countries
Chapter Eleven: Global Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Segment by Types
Chapter Thirteen: Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market Forecast by Regions (2020-2026)continued…
To Check Discount of Wearable Health Tracking Devices Market @ https://www.arcognizance.com/discount/1197723
If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.
Author: Posted By: nihil