China’s President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump attend a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Nov. 9, 2017.
Nicolas Asfouri | AFP | Getty Images
The coronavirus pandemic will cause China’s purchases of U.S. goods this year to fall way short of what was agreed to in the “phase one” trade deal, according to a forecast by think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The American think tank projected that exports of U.S. goods to China could come in at only $60 billion for all of 2020 — much lower than the $186.6 billion needed to meet requirements in the agreement that both countries signed in January.
That forecast was “admittedly” a “worst-case scenario” because Chinese purchases of U.S. goods could rise later in the year as the economy recovers, but any increases still “will not change the overall picture, just the details,” Scott Kennedy, senior advisor and trustee chair in Chinese business and economics at CSIS, wrote in a Friday report.
“The targets were never realistic; they were just gaudy numbers meant to impress. The pandemic made the unrealistic the impossible,” he said.
The coronavirus was first detected in China late last year, and Beijing responded by taking measures that many considered draconian — such as locking down cities, suspending public transport and shutting businesses — to contain the outbreak. Those measures led to a plunge in demand for goods and services in China, one of the world’s largest consumer markets.
Consequently, U.S. goods exports to China fell by 10% year over year in the first quarter of 2020, noted Kennedy, citing data from the U.S. Commerce Department. Official U.S. data for services is not yet published, but “it is likely to show a huge falloff due to the collapse of Chinese travel and tourism and the early closing of U.S. universities,” he added.
Several factors were behind the decline in U.S. goods exports to China in the first quarter:
- Energy exports were “perhaps the biggest disappointment” after falling by 33.3%;
- Sales of commercial aircraft were “essentially at zero” and that of automobiles were down by 46.9%;
- Soybean exports were lower by 39.4%;
- U.S. failing to take advantage of China’s “sky-high” demand for pork following a swine fever outbreak that caused a shortage of the staple meat. But the coronavirus caused many American meat-processing plants to halt production.
In the phase one trade deal, China agreed to buy an additional $200 billion in U.S. goods and services by 2021 on top of 2017 levels. That means that U.S. goods and services exports to China should climb to around $290 billion in 2020 and $330 billion in 2021, according to the agreement released by the U.S. Trade Representative.
Relations between the U.S. and China have worsened in recent weeks, with Washington and Beijing disputing over a variety of issues, including the origin of the coronavirus.
Renewed tensions between the two economic powerhouses raised questions about the status of the phase one trade agreement, which investors and analysts considered a sort of truce in a U.S.-China trade war that started two years ago.
Top officials from both countries spoke over the phone last week and agreed to stay on course with regards to the trade deal, but U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he was “very torn” about whether to end the agreement.
CSIS’ Kennedy outlined in the report three options that the Trump administration can take to address China’s “poor performance” in fulfilling the trade deal:
Each of those options has its own advantages and disadvantages, wrote Kennedy. The first two options could prompt protest and retaliation from China, while the third is “the most politically risky approach” for Trump, he added.
“There is a fourth option, but it is not one the administration will choose: Admit that the purchases component of the deal was a mistake to begin with and reconsider their entire approach to China,” he said.
Author: Yen Nee Lee
Forex News – Latest Forex and Currency News
The Pound Sterling edged lower against its US rival, a repercussion of higher yields on US Treasuries which helped boost demand for the greenback.
The European Central Bank’s Executive Board member, Isabel Schnabel said on Monday that only the European Court of Justice has a saying regarding the actions of the ECB
Non-farm payroll reports showed that the U.S. unemployment rate hit 14.7 percent in April,
As global coronavirus cases crossed 4,181,000, South Korea warned of a second wave of infections which may already be hitting the country.
The US Dollar came under heavy pressure in Tokyo trade as FX trades await the release of US labor data, specifically, April’s Non-Farms Payroll Report.
Some optimism from the Bank of England helped to push the Pound Sterling higher against the Euro and US Dollar during early London trade today.
The Bank of England decided to keep its cash rates on hold at 0.1 percent and decided to set its bond purchasing program target at 645 billion pounds.
Oil prices edged modestly higher on Thursday after falling 2 percent on Wednesday to snap a five-day winning streak.
Market updates for May 7: Global stock markets falter as the U.S. reports another 2 million+ unemployment claims yesterday.
The Pound Sterling continues to have trouble finding its footing ahead of tomorrow’s meeting of Bank of England policymakers.
The Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte said on Wednesday that because of the independence of the Central Bank, no constitutional court can decide what the bank can do or not.
Oil futures were modestly lower on Wednesday afternoon in Asia, after seeing five consecutive days of gains for the first time since July 2019.
May 6 updates: Global stock markets remain strong on optimism that the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic has peaked in most OECD nations.
Thanks to an improvement in risk sentiment, the Pound Sterling was able to recover some earlier losses during Tuesday trading in London.
Forex News: Live Technical Analysis and Market Wrapups
Relative to other instruments in the forex asset class, eur/usd ranked 28th the day prior in terms of percentage price change.
Or to simplify this another way, note that out of the past 30 days eur/chf’s price has gone down 16 them.
So, if the breakout occurs to the upside, the sellers could just sell at the resistance….
As for the alignment of the moving averages, well, it’s a bit mixed up; the 20, 50, 100, and 200 do not progress from largest to smallest, or vice versa.
This imputes a buy/sell ratio of 0.47, which is bearish.
Price action traders in particular will want to note that the 14 day period appears to show price forming a base; this could indicate that a support/resistance level is developing.
This imputes a buy/sell ratio of 0.25, which is bearish.
Relative to other instruments in the forex asset class, usd/cad ranked 7th the day prior in terms of percentage price change.
The closest is the 100 day average, which is 83.2 pips away.
Also of note is that on a 30 day basis price appears to be forming a base — which could the stage for it being a support/resistance level going forward.